Sunkavalli Rama Krishna, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.7593 OF 2017 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the following relief: "to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the official respondents in trying to disburse the land compensation amount of acquisition of the petitioner's land an extent of Ac. 2-12 guntas in Sy.No. 359 situated at Venkatapuram Village, Pedaravigudem Post, Kukunuru Mandal, Kukunuru Revenue Division, West Godavari District to the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, and consequently direct the official respondents not to disburse the compensation of the land acquisition amount till the adjudication of dispute between petitioner and 4th respondent." 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition for respondents 1 to 3, apart from perusing the material available on record. 3.

In the present writ petition, petitioner is disputing the right of the 4th respondent in receiving compensation amount in respect of the subject property. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader, on instructions, that award has not yet been passed in respect of the subject property and it

AVSS,J W.P.No.7593 of 2017 is open for the petitioner as well as the 4th respondent to raise their claims before the Authorities under Act 30 of 2013. 4.

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Respondents 1 to 3, this Court is of the considered opinion that ends of justice would be served, if the petitioner as well as the 4th respondent are permitted to raise their claims before the respondent authorities with regard to their right over the subject property.

5.

For the aforesaid reasons, this writ petition is disposed of, keeping it open to the petitioner as well as the 4th respondent to raise their respective claims before the 2nd respondent and it is open for the 2nd respondent to consider the same and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.

6.

Miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed in consequence. No order as to costs.

____________________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J 06.03.2017 SS