D.B.R. Prasad (Ec No. 013299), Khammam Dist. v. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. And Another

[ 33041

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11476 OF 2006 Between:

D.B.R Prasad (EC No. 0123299) S/o. Bheemaiah Working as SE (EandM), Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Kothagudem, Khammam Dlstrict. ...PETITIONER AND I The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Dirctor, Kothagudem, Khammam Dlstrict The Chairman & Managing Director, Kothagudem, Khammam Dlstrict.

Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia prayinq that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith. the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of Mandamus- i. declare the impugned proceeding No.CRP/PER/C l0'1215149 dt. 1'l12-2OO4 issued by the 2nd Respondent and consequential Appellate Order No. CRP /PER/C/01211057 dL.25-4-2OS issued on behalf of 1st Respondent as illegal arbitrary and set aside the same. ii, Consequently direct the respondents to restore the increment deferred in terms of impugned proceeding No. CRP/PER/C/01215149 dt. 11-12-2004 issued by the 2nd respondent and treat petitioners promotion as Superintending Engineer (E&M) in E5 grade along with all the consequential benefits such as back wages and seniority etc., w.e.f. 1-10-2003

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 14255 OF 2006) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to treat petitioner's notional promotion as SE (E &lV) in E5 grade as with effect from 1-10-2003 for all purposes, pending disposal of the above WRIT PETITION Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VRINDA AGARWAL REP SRI K. VASUDEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.11476 OF 2006

ORDER

Ms. Vrinda Agarwal, learned counsel representing Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, informed this Court that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

2. In view of the above submission. this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SDi. M. JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,1. OneCCto SRI. KVASUDEVAREDDYAdvocate IOPUC]

2. One CC to SRl. NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAO Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies BM GJP ,SL _---

HIGH COURT DATED:1110912025

ORDER

R { i la .l o ( I c oo I WP.No.11476 of 2006 ? I JAil 2026 * r{!

JDISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS g \} ,6"-L