Thatipalli Shobha Rani v. The Govt. Of Telangana Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

ri [ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) { FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEI\,TBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 33317 OF 2014 Between:

Thatipalli ShobharRani, Wo: Srinivas, 30 Yrs., Agriculture, Rlio Narsingapur Village, Jaipur Mandal, Adilabad District.

t , 'l ...pETtnoNER AND t The Govt. of Telangarra Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

The Revenue Divisional Officer Mancherial Mandal, Mancherial, Adilabad District.

3. The Tahsildar, Jaipur Mandal, Jaipur, Adilabad District.

4. Challagonda Rajya Laxmi, Wo: Vidyasagar Rao, Rl/o C/o Ch. Rajeshwar Rao, C/o RM HVAC Systems P\i't. Ltd., # 9, Krishna Apts., Ameerpet X Road, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings entertaining the representation dt.02-092014 submitted by 4h respoMent as ROR Appeal Case No.G/4519/2004 by the 2nd respondent under Sec.s(B) of A.P.Record of Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of the said Act. .A N :1OF PMP. NO: 41664OF 20'14 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant

stay of all further proceedings in ROR Appeat Case No.G/4519/2004 on the file of 2nd respondent under Sec.S(B) of AP Record of Rights in Land & pattadar pass books Act 1971 Counsel for the Petitioiler: SRI T V S PRABHAKARA RAO jll Counsel forthe Respoildent No.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE il Counsel for the ResponUent No.4: SRI P. RAJA SRIPATHI RAO The Court made the following: ORDER ri I

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO Writ PetitionNo.333 17 of2o14 ORDER:

When the matter was taken up for consideration on 28.11.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. To give one opportunity, the matter was posted to 07.12.2023. On 02.12.2023 also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was posted to 08.12.2023 under the caption .For Dismissal".

2.

Today a.lso there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, inspite of listing under the caption "For Dismissal". It appears that the petitioner is not having any interest in prosecuting the matter.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

' Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/.C.PRA KU R ASSISTANT //TRUE COPY// sEcTto OFFICER To,'1. One CC to Sri T V S Prabhakara Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. One CC to Sri P. Raja Sripathi Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies WTJ SB

il I lll rHIGH COURT til lir 20i23 DATED:08/12l T o (4 i

ORDER

)t o .$ cJ <!

o t,.,.

I d WP.No.33317 ..\.

-t \ \ n'

cI:

* c J DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.

i-cYe6 W trf,I"J