High Court for State of TelanganaWP(TR)/4490/2017dismissed as infructuous

P. Narender v. The State Of Telangana

2023-03-02N.V.Shravan Kumar3 pages

[ 32ss l HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION fiR) NO: 4490 OF 2017 Between:

P. Narender, .S/o P. Rajamallu, Aged about 46 years, Secondary Grade Teacher, MPUPS Ratanapeta, Bowenapally (M), Karimnagar Distiict, Rt/o. H.No.7-2-'150, Mankamma Thota Street, Karimnagar - 505001 . Taduri Srilatha, D/o, Venkateshwarlu, Aged about 38 years, Secondary Grade Teacher, PS Chintagutta. Shankarapatnam (M), Karimnagar District, Rl/o. H.No.7 -2-27 1, Mankammathota, Karimnagar District. K Bhaskar, S/o Kankamallu, Aged about 47 years, Secondary Grade Teacher, MPPS, SC Colony, Alugunur (V), Thimapur (M), Karimnagar District, Rlio. 9-5131 , Sapthasir colony, Karimnagar District. ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, School Education department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector, Karimnagar District.

4. The District Educational Officer, Karimnagar District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents in not considering their claim for promotion to the post of School Assistant on the ground that they are repatriated to their parent district under G.O.Ms.No.610 dated 30.12.1985 even though they are fully eligible and qualified and number of their juniors were considered for promotion is illegal arbitrary and discriminatory, unconstitutional consequently to direct the respondent to consider the claim of the applicants for promotion to the post of School Assistant by following the Proc.Rc.No.2319lSerlV-2120'13 dated 04 07.2015 on par with their juniors with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI NAYAKAWADI RAMESH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.4490 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) would not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as in fru ctu o us.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs SD/- G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT.REGISTRAR //TRUE coPY// C111 SECTION OFFICER To

1. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES, High Court for the State of Tetangana, at Hyderabad. [OUTI

2. One CC to SRI NAYAKAWADI RAMESH, Advocate [OPUCI

3. Two CD Copies PSK GJP BSR

HIGH COURT DATED:0210312023 'di. 5 rAfq ,:l (

ORDER

i: zs APRzt?3 WP(TR).No.4490 of 2017 DrsMrsstNc THE WR|T PET|TION (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

g!(