← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaARBAPPL/36/2022withdrawn

Joshi Victor Rayavarapu v. The President And 5 Others

2022-09-02Ujjal Bhuyan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 36 OF 2022 Between:

Joshi Victor Rayavarapu, Sio Late Naga Bhushanam, Director, Health and Temperance Dept., East Central lndia Union of SDA, Chapel Road, Abids, Hyderabad - 500 001 ...APPLICANT AND

1. The President, East Central lndia Union of Seventh-Day Adventists (SDA), Post Bag No.21 , Chapel Road, Abids, Hyderabad - 500 001

2. The Executive Secretary, East Central lndia Union of SDA, Post Bag No. 21, Chapel Road, Abids, Hyderabad - 500 001

3. The Treasurer, East Central lndia Union of SDA, Post Bag No. 21 , Chapel Road, Abids, Hyderabad - 500 001

4. The President, Southern Asia Division of SDA, Post Box -2, HCF, Hosur, Krishnagiri District, Tamilnadu State - 6351 1 0.

5. The Secretary, Southern Asia Division of SDA, Post Box -2, HCF, Hosur, Krishnagiri District, Tamilnadu State - 635110.

6. The Associate Treasurer and Retirement Plan Administrator, Southern Asia Division of SDA, Post Box -2, HCF, Hosur, Krishnagiri District, Tamilnadu State - 635110 ..RESPONDENTS Arbitration Application Under Section 11 (5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Rl/w. Scheme for appoint of Arbitrator, '1996 praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to appoint a named Arbitrator to resolve the disputes pending between the applicant and the Respondents and to award the costs of the application .

Counsel for the Applicant : SRl. RAMESH CHILLA Counsel for the Respondents: MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM The Court made the following: ORDER

1l]g LTQ VSLE THE_CI]]EF TUSTICE UIT^I BI T] ! 4N itrati()n li l') !2 ORDEII.

Fleard Mr Ramesh Chilla, learned counsel for die applicant. Leamed ( cunsel for the applicant submits on instructions that applicanr. wi nts to withdraw the arbitration applicrtrcn. In view ol the above, the artitration applicati<,n ir; dismissed on withdrawal. l.lcr costs.

fu a sequ:I. miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand dismissed.

\ SDr-li..SRlN|VASA RAO JCIIhIT REGISTRAR ' 'tt 61,ilr r SE.C:TION'OFF!CER To, //TRUE COPYII

1. One CC to SRI RAMESH CHILLA Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SRl. MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM' Advocatt.'[OPUC]

3. Two CD Copier

4. One Spare Col y

HIGH COURT DATED:02109 2022 I L {.

/a ,: -- t,-i,:-i. 1 t ?t?2 \lI t{

ORDER

t:

-.

ARB. APPL.N >,,36 of 2022 DISMISSING THE AR.]ITRATION APPLICATION (