P. Narasimha Reddy, v. The District Collector, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * * WRIT PETITION No.25885 of 2015 BETWEEN P. Narasimha Reddy.

... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Karimnagar District and others. ...RESPONDENTS DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 24.08.2015 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR 1.

Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?

No 2.

Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

No 3.

Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment?

No ORDER:

Petitioner appears to be aggrieved by the order of the third respondent in proceedings No.B/4323/2008 dated 15.04.2010. Petitioner claims that the said order was communicated to him only recently and that he has filed an appeal on 16.03.2015 before the second respondent.

2. It is, however, noticed that the said appeal is in the form of a representation and if the petitioner intends to question the impugned order of the third respondent, he must file a regular appeal in the proper form explaining the reasons as to why the appeal is being preferred after lapse of time. If such an appeal is preferred, the second respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders expeditiously.

The writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J August 24, 2015 DSK