High Court for State of TelanganaWP/8557/2013dismissed as infructuous

K. Pullaiah, S/O. K. Durgubaba, v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh,

2023-12-08Nagesh Bheemapaka5 pages

[ 33oo ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 8557 OF 2013 Between:

K. Pullaiah, S/o. K. Durgubaba, aged 30 years, Occ Kammarigam Village, Bejjur Mandal, District Adilabad. Adarsha Rythu, Rl/o ,....PETITIONER AND

1. The Government ofAndhra Pradesh, Represented by the Secretary to Revenue Disaster Management Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Secretary, Agriculture Department, Secretariat, Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector, Adilabad, Diskict Adilabad.

4. The Joint Director of Agriculture, Adilabad, District, Adilabad.

5. The Assistant Director of Agriculture, Kaghaznagar Division, District Adilabad.

6. Mandal Agriculture Officer, Kaghaznagar, District Adilabad.

7. Agriculture Extension Officer, Bejjur, Be1'jur Mandal, District Adilabad.

8. The Tahsildar Bejjur tulandal, Bejjur, District Adilabad.

9. The Village Revenue Officer, Kammarigaon, Village and GP, Bejjur Mandal, District Adilabad10. Korthe Shankar, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Kuntala Manepally Village, Bejjur Mandal, District Adilabad.

.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction, holding that the impugned

Memo No.C7l38812O13 dated 07-03-20'13 issued by the Respondent No.4 with the approval of Respondent No.3, is illegal, arbitrary, malicious and politically motivated and is issued without any notice or conducting any inquiry and against the principles of natural justice and fair play and may be pleased to set aside the same.

I.A.NO:1 OF 2013(WVMP. NO: 4048 OF 2013) Between 1 . Govemment of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Secretary, Agriculture Department Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Adilabad, District Adilabad.

3. The Joint Director of Agriculture, Adilabad, District, Adilabad.

4. The Assistant Director of Agriculture, Kaghaznagar Division, District Adilabad.

5. Mandal Agriculture Officer, Kaghaznagar, District Adilabad.

6. Agriculture Extension Officer, Bejjur, Bejjur Mandal, District Adilabad. ....PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS AND K. Pullaiah, S/o. K. Durgubaba, aged 30 years, Occ :Adarsha Rythu, R/o. Kammarigam Village, Bejjur Mandal, District Adilabad. I .....RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

2. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Secretary to Revenue Disaster Management Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The Tahsildar Bejjur Mandal, Bejjur, District Adilabad.

4. The Village Revenue Officer, Kammarigaon, Village and GP, Bejjur Mandal, District Adilabad.

5. Korthe Shankar, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Kuntala Manepally Village, Bejjur Mandal, District Adilabad.

(Respondent Nos.2 to 5 are not necessary parties to this petition) .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 21-03-2013 made in W.P.M.P.No.10657 of 2013 in W.P.No. 8557 of 2013.

|.A.NO:2 OF 2013 {WPMP.NO:10657 OF 2013) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Memo.No.C7138812013, dated 07-03-20'13 issued by the 4th respondent with the approval of 3rd respondent, during the pendency of the writ petition, Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MD. AJMAL AHMED Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 3, 8 & I : AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 7 : AGP FOR AGRICULTURE Counsel for the Respondent No.10 : -- The Court made the following ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO.4557 of 2()13 ORDER:

Learned counsel for respondent/ Government pleader submitted that the cau'se in the writ petition does not survive. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh case in the event of any cause survives in this writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, shall stand closed.

SD/.N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// secrroYfrrcen To

1. Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

2. Two CCs to GP For Agriculture, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI

3. One CC to Sri Md.Ajmal Ahmed, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies SA GJP

HIGH COURT DATED:0811212023 TA S e rF Jq v o b.

[ 2 JAl'i ?[2q

ORDER

* 4J o * DE P WP.No.8557 ot 2013 DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.