Kura Veerendher Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

I s183 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 9074 OF 2024 Between:

Kura Veerendher Reddy, Son of Late Kura Satyanarayana Reddy aged about 52 years, Occupation- Business Resident of Plot No.19 86 20, Wahab Nagar, Sikh Village, Secunderabad Telangana State - 500009 ..pETt*oNER AND

1. THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Represented by its Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad, Telangana

2. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE/STATION HOUSE OFFICER, Central Crime Station, Hyderabad. Old Commissioner office, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, Telangana- 500029'

RES''NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in not conducting investigation and filing final report U/s.'173 of Cr.P.C. in F.l.R.No.'125 of 2023 dated 03/04/2023 of P.S. Central Crime Station, Hyderabad, registered on the Complaint dated 2311212022 (acknowledged on 2411212022) of the Petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondent M.2 to Complete the investigation and file final report U/s.173 of Cr.P.C. in F.l.R.No.'

125 of 2023 dated 0310412023 lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to complete the investigation and file final report U/ s.173 of Cr.P.C. in F.l.R.No.125 ot 2023 dated O310412O23 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DHARMESH D.K.

HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITIO N No.9074 OF 2024 ORDER: (ORAL) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that subsequent to filing of this writ petition, notice under Section 91 read with 160 Cr.P.C has been issued to the petitioner to furnish documents/evidence, and as such, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

2. ln view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed and, accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. lf the petitioner has any further grievance and if the investigation is delayed beyond reasonable time and also if there are lapses on the part of the lnvestigation Officer, the petitioner is given liberty to approach this Court seeking modification of this order. No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed.

SD/- C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSTSTANT REGTSIBAR r'-\ /- v'

SECTION OFFICER To, //TRUE COPY// The Secretary, Home Department, State of Telang-a,na, Hy-derabad, Telangana The Joint Commissioner Of Police/Station House Officer, Central Crime Station, Hvderabad. Old Commissioner office, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, Tetangana- 500029 Ohe CC to Sri Dharmesh D.K.Jaiswal Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP For Home, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] Two CD Copies s 3.

4.

5.

MBC GJP

HIGH COURT DATED: 2910412024 o\ /€.

a {1HE s14 fl 1 ,'r,li l0l4 o O (o '/ t o .'l^. -,-., -

ORDER

WP.No.9074 of 2024 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION GJ,{ a o WITHOUT COSTS b * \