← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWA/378/2019dismissed

V.Krupakar v. The State Of Telangana

2019-04-30Raghvendra Singh Chauhan,A.Rajasheker Reddy3 pages

High Court for the State of Telangana The Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan and The Hon'ble Sri Justice A.Rajasheker Reddy W.A. No.378 of 2019 Date: 30-04-2019 Between:

V. Krupakar ...Appellant and The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat Hyderabad and 3 others

...Respondents

Counsel for the appellant:

Mrs. N. Usha Rani Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following:

HACJ & ARR, J WA.No.378 of 2019 Dt: 30-04-2019 Judgment: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan) This appeal is filed against the order dated 22-04-2019, passed by a learned Single Judge, in W.P. No. 8176 of 2019. The learned counsel for the appellant- writ petitioner submits that a wrong observation has been made by the learned Single Judge in the impugned order.

According to the order dated 22-04-2019, the learned Single Judge has observed as under:

"Having elaborately argued, the learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the petitioner may be given an opportunity to submit an effective representation to the authorities concerned to establish that the disputed land admeasuring 266.66 square yards situated in Survey Nos. 342/A, 343 and 344 of Attapur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, belongs to the petitioner and not to the Government."

However, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that no such request was ever made by her before the learned Single Judge.

Since the learned counsel for the appellant questions the observation made by the learned Single Judge, she should have filed a review petition before the learned Single Judge

HACJ & ARR, J WA.No.378 of 2019 Dt: 30-04-2019 bringing to the notice of the learned Single Judge that no such request was ever made by her before the Court. Therefore, this writ appeal is not maintainable at present. It is, hereby, dismissed. However, the appellant is free to take recourse of the legal remedies available to him. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, stand disposed of as infructuous.

______________________________ (Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, ACJ) ____________________ (A.Rajasheker Reddy, J) Dt: 30th April, 2019 lur