← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/2192/2016dismissed as not pressed

G.Ganesh v. M/S. Sri Krishna Developers,

2017-06-22M.Satyanarayana Murthy1 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY C.R.P.No.1990 OF 2016 AND C.R.P.No.2192 OF 2016 COMMON ORDER:

Earlier when the matters were listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. On 20.06.2017, learned counsel for the petitioners appeared and argued the matters in part. But today, when the matters are called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners though the matters are listed under the caption "for dismissal". It indicates that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the revisions. Therefore, the revision petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions in these petitions, if any, shall stands closed.

__________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J 22.06.2017 kvrm