← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/20042/2015disposed of no costs

Dasari Mulakanurappa S/O Late D. Narayanappa, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2015-07-13Vilas V.Afzulpurkar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.20042 of 2015 BETWEEN Dasari Mulakanurappa and another.

... PETITIONERS AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: MR. PRABHAKAR KARANAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is that the fifth respondent is insisting upon No Objection Certificate for registration of the

document in respect of their private patta lands admeasuring Ac.10.73 cents in Sy.Nos.477-2B and 477-2C of Kalyanadurgam Village and Mandal, Anantapur District.

2. The issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in WP.No.17809 of 2015 and batch dated 22.06.2015. In view of the same, following the aforesaid judgment, this writ petition is also disposed of directing the registering authority concerned to receive and process the document presented by the petitioners without insisting upon the no objection certificate to be obtained by them. The registering authority concerned is further directed to receive and process the documents in accordance with the Registration Act, 1908 and Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and if the document is in conformity with the provisions of the aforesaid enactments, thereafter, register and release the document in accordance with the due procedure. It is also made clear that in the event of registering authority not being satisfied with the compliance under the Registration Act or the Stamp Act, appropriate refusal endorsement together with reasons shall be recorded and communicated to the petitioners in terms of Section 71 of the Registration Act.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J July 13, 2015 DSK