S.Ramaswamy, Adilabad District v. The Commissioner,Mandamarri Municipality, Adilabad

\ r) [ 31681 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 26829 OF 2OOg Between:

S.Ramaswamy, S/o.Late Rajaram, aged 8'1 years, Occ : Business, Flio.H.No.64-200, Market Area Mandamarry, Adilabad District.

.....PETITIONER AND The Commissioner, Mandamarri Municipality, Adilabad District ....RESPONDENT Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more particularly in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents abnormal enhancement of property tax over house No.64-200, situated at Market Area, Mandamarri, Adilabad District from Rs.907/- per annum to 4,625/- by the respondent without giving details insisting for payment by the petitioner and not passing any order against representation dated 16.11.2009 as illegal, arbitrary' against the principles of natural justice and violating of ArXicle 14 of the Constitution of lndia.

i

l.A.NO:1 OF 2009 (!vPMP.NO:34948 OF2009) Petition under section 151 cpc praTtng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High court mpy be pleased to direct the respondent not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner as well as his property in view of notice No.147 dated 7.g.2009 issued by the respondent pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V.NARASTMHA GOUD, ADVOCATE FOR SRI CHINDAM ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent : SRI S.S.NAGESWARAREDDy The Court made the following ORDER

Y o THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.26829 of 2OO9 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing Sri V.Narasimha Goud, learned counsel representing Sri Chindam Anjane5rulu, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that in view of interim orders, dated 23.03.2010, granted by this Court in this Writ Petition, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and it has become infructuous.

2.

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this petition shall stand closed.

SD/- L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSI T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To

1. One CC to SRI CHINDAM ANJANEYULU, Advocate TOPUCL

2. One CC to SRI S S.NAGESWARA REDDY, Advocate IOPUC]

3. Two CD Copies \ SA GJP ty_ t

.ct HIGH COURT DATED:1611'212024

ORDER

WP.No.26829 of 2009 Y()(r thE s14 e :L 24 llAR 20[ )) a o€.sr,arc r.rEO DISMISSINCi THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHUOT COSTS.

@ {l Alil