← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/10973/2011allowed no costs

Adverd v. The State, Through Sho Ps., Jagtial Tn, Jagital

2018-11-16T. Rajani2 pages

SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.1 0 9 7 3 of 2 0 1 1 & I A.No.1 of 2 0 1 4 ORDER:

I A.No.1 of 2 0 1 4 :

This application is filed requesting the Court to permit the second respondent to compound the offence and record the compromise entered into by the parties and quash the proceedings against the petitioner, who is A1, in FIR.No.310 of 2011 on the file of the Station House Officer, Jagtial Town Police Station, Jagtial, Karimnagar District.

2.

The parties, together, with their respective counsel, are present in the Court and on being specifically asked, both the parties confirm the terms of compromise as recorded in the memorandum of compromise appended to this application.

3.

The terms of the compromise show that out of agony the second respondent filed the complaint but now he realized that the petitioner has not committed any such offence, as such he does not want to prosecute the petitioner. As per the compromise, the second respondent has no objection to compound the offence and quash the proceedings against the petitioner in FIR.No.310 of 2011 on the file of the Station House Officer, Jagtial Town Police Station, Jagtial, Karimnagar District.

Since, I am satisfied that the aforesaid compromise is executed by the parties out of their free will and they confirm the terms thereof, when being specifically asked, there is no impediment in recording the said compromise.

The application is accordingly allowed.

CRLP.No.1 0 9 7 3 of 2 0 1 1 :

In view of the above, the criminal petition is allowed and the further proceedings against the petitioner, who is A1, in FIR.No.310 of 2011 on the file of the Station House Officer, Jagtial Town Police Station, Jagtial, Karimnagar District, are hereby quashed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________ T. RAJANI, J November 16, 2018 DSK