A. Anjaiah v. Sri Anjaneyulu,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
trffi t 26e7 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DEC-EMBER ' ' -'ii,vo THoUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI ,' .n.,-i.'.- ;i/. if{Yi .
liirl'lf: 'r CONTE PT CASE NO : 873 OF 2023 Contempt Case under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contemot of Courts Act 1971 to ounish the respondents n"'eil toi *ilff'l disobedience of order daled: 1o'12 2021 [rli"ir'i" r.n. fu-o.2 of 2o2o in wP' No' 1e383 of 2007' Between:
A.Aniaiah,S/o.lateA.Yellaiah,aged.alout,5g-years,occ:Conductor,E. ft i6'b?i6: nLNo. i?-z-szs)itilri'irni-g'a"' saidabad' Hvderabad' ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.1 AND Eri Anjaneyur u, P"p,ot M1n?:"I JSFiEi:,"tlX':f Blifi'il:HflX,ffi i";lln:i. (Prior io bifurcation known as iit'&.,'.
'
il, 1 "t RESPONDENT/PEITIONER
2. Sri Varaprasad, Regional Manager-HR' TSRTC' Hyderabad Region' M'G'B S' HYderabad.
3. Sri Badri Narayanana, Depot Manager' TSRTC' Bus Depot' Farooqnagar' The Court made the following: ORDER Hyderabad RESPONDENTS/PROPOSED RESPONDENTS NO.2 & 3 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V NARASIMHA GOUD Counsel for the Respondent no.2: SRI R ANURAG for THOOM SRINIVAS (SC for RTC) Counsel for the Respondent no.1 and 3: None Appeared ;:,.#:;, ;:..fffir':
rii
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI CONTEM PT CASE No.873 oF 2023 ORDER:
\ \ When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel for TSRTC appearing for the respondents has informed the Court that the order, dated lO.L2.2O2t, passed by this Court in I.A.No.2 of 2020 in W.P.No.19383 of 2007 has been complied with by the respondents vide proceedings, dated 2I.12.2023. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the order passed by this Court has not been complied with in its true letter and spirit.
3.
This Court, having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel For the parties, is of the considered view that the respondents have complied with the order, dated 10.12.2021, passed by this Court vide proceedings, dated 21.12.2023, and therefore, the Contempt Case can be closed.
4.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings, dated 2L.L2.2023, in accordance with law, if he is aggrieved by the same. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Contempt Case shall stand closed.
SD/- T.SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGIS '.1t ird:
, -,.i:., //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER ..:ffi To .,1 One CC to SRl. V NARASIMHA GOUD' Advocate-[OPUCI il: # iI ini. rHoor',r sRlNlvAS' sc ror rsRrc [oPUCl Two CD CoPies R P Yr'
,i:,j '1r'o;
.l u;ifu* ;ii ,...
HIGH COURT DATED: 29fl212023 '1i''ra:
2 E iji: til4 ,,l -)oo ,,9 * !;: -'!':'
"i- '/'
'
-- ;--'
3E"..fftr. or zo23 'f'f# !. i-;Ii CLOSING THE CC i # #.
c{#4d i i