V. Satyavardhan Reddy v. The State Of Telangana And 4 Others

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13685 of 2022 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energy appearing for respondent No.1, Sri R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4, and Sri N. Praveen Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.5. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself. 2) In this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents, more particularly respondent Nos.3 and 4, in refusing to release the power supply to the premises of the petitioner bearing Plot Nos.224 and 235, Sri Sai Balaji Enclave in Sy. No.

200, 203, 204, 205, 212, 213, 215/A, 229, 230, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252 and 254 admeasuring to an extent of 533-32 Square Yards situated at Mallampet Village and Gram Panchayat, Dundigal-Gandimaisamma Mandal (formerly known as Quthbullapur Mandal), Medchal-Malkagjgiri District. 3) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent authorities have refused to release the power supply to the subject premises belonging to the petitioner vide refusal letter No.LTM216480227 dated 20.12.2021.

4) Learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4, on instructions, has stated that basing on the letter addressed by respondent

No.5 vide No.NMC/G/03/2020 dated 14.05.2020, power supply to the petitioner was refused to be released. He further submits that if the petitioner makes an application, again, the authorities will receive the same and pass necessary orders thereon, as per law. 5) In view of the above made submissions, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh application before respondents Nos.3 and 4 seeking release of power supply to the subject premises, which shall be received by the authorities and necessary orders be passed thereon, strictly as per law, without reference to the proceedings in No.NMC/G/03/2020 dated 14.05.2020 of respondent No.5, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6) Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ A. ABHISHEK REDDY, J Date: 17.03.2022 Nvl/krl