The Assistant Accounts Officer v. Podduturi Narsimha Reddy
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF I\,,IARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B,VIJAYSEN REDDY wRlT PETITION NO: 9748 OF 2019 Between:
1. The Assistant Accounts Officer, ERO/TSNPDCL, Bheemgal.
2. The Additional Divisional Engineer, OP/TSNPDCL, Bheemgat.
3. The Superintending Engineer, OPffSNPDCL, Nizamabad.
4. The Chairman and Managing Director, TSNPDCL, Kazipet, Warangal ...PETITIONERS AND PodduturiNarsimha Reddy, S/o.Bhoom Reddy Aged about 44 years, Occ Business R/o.Chengal Village of Bheemgal Mlnd-al Nizamanad District. 1.
The Honourable District Consumer Redressed Forum, al Nizamabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more in the nature writ of certiorari, calling for original records in c.c.No.1 I of 2019 on the file of District consumer Redressed Forum Nizamabad and quash the same, as it is illegal, without jurisdiction and contrary to Provisions of Electricity Act, 2003 and Article i 9 (1) (g) of constitution of lndia.
lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend all further proceedings in C.C.No.11 of 2019 on the file of District Consumer Redressed Forum Nizamabad, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioners:SRI. ZAKIR ALI DANISH, SC FOR TSNPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRl. P VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No. 2:
The Court made the following:
Item No.32 THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE It. VIJAYSEN REDDY W.P.No.9748 of 2019 ORDER: (Per the Hon'bte the Chief Justic€ Hinra Kohti) l.
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving the right of the petitioners to challenge the order dated 12.03.2019 in C.C.No. l1 of 2019 passed by the leamed District Consumer Redressal Forum, Nizamabad by preferring a review petition, on the ground that the District Consumer Redressal Forum is not vested with the jurisdiction to entertain the complaint filed by the private respondent.
2.
Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The present petition is disposed ofas not pressed along with the pending applications, ifany. SD/.K.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGIS R ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, The Honourable District Consumer Redressed Forum, at Nizamabad One CC to Sri. Zakir Ali Danish, SC for TSNPDCL [OPUC] One CC to Sri. P Vishnuvardhana Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies.
^I--.
.7 Pt\4 \
HIGH COURT DATED:16/03/2021 tt,- {
ORDER
IHE sTAiA WP.No.9748 of 2019 oo 25 r4AR 2021 * * Disposing of the WP Without costs.
*