High Court for State of TelanganaWP/23761/2015disposed of no costs

Koppoju Satya Venkata Ramana, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2015-07-30Vilas V.Afzulpurkar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH **** WRIT PETITION NO.23761 OF 2015 Between:

1. Koppuju Satya Venkata Ramana and three others. ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department, Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad, rep.by its Prl.Secretary and five others. ...RESPONDENTS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments? Yes/No

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No

3. Whether Their Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment? Yes/No THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO.23761 OF 2015 ORDER:

The petitioners filed an appeal seeking cancellation of pattadar

passbooks and title deeds issued in favour of respondent Nos.4 to 6 for the lands situated in Survey Nos.74/12, 63/2, 65/2, 66, 39/3, 29/3, 41/12, 41/13, 41/14, 33/2 and 33/4 of Pappusettipalem Village, Golugonda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, which is said to be pending with the second respondent in Rc.No.222/2014/B/dt...7.2014. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that though a notice was issued to all the parties to attend hearing of the appeal on 19.07.2014, at request of the respondents, the hearing of the appeal was adjourned. Thereafter, hearing of the appeal is not fixed nor the appeal is disposed of. The present Writ Petition is filed seeking appropriate directions to the second respondent. It is not necessary to issue notice to respondent Nos.

4 to 6 in view of the order proposed to be passed, as this Court does not intend to go into the merits of the claim of the petitioners. It would, therefore, suffice to direct the second respondent to fix an early date of hearing after giving notice to all the parties and after hearing the parties, shall dispose of the appeal expeditiously, preferably within two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_______________________ (VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J) 30th July 2015 RRB