Smt.T.J.Amruthamma. v. T.J.Shethana.

\ [ 3208 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUST]CE P.SREE SUOHA APPEAL SUIT NO: 998 oF 2003 Appeal under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment ahd Decree dated: 7.3.2003 made in O.S.No.689 of '1995 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar. Between:

Smt.T.J.Amruthamma, W/o T.J.Shethana Housewife Fl/o H.No.18-140/3, Road No.5, Kamalanagar, Dilsukhnagar, Rangd Reddy District. ...APPELLANT/ PLAINTIFF AND t.J.Shethana, S/o T.D.Shethana, Rtd. Dy. Supdt. of Police No 2-4-6118'l, TRT Qtrs., Kachiguda Kamela, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT/ DEFENDANT For the Appellant : SRI T.V.S.PRABHAKARA RAO, Advocate (not present) For the sole Respondent : SRI K.PAVAN KUMAR, Advocate The Court delivered the following : JUDGMENT

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA Appeal Suit No.998 of 2OO3

JUDGMENT

When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for thc appellant.

On 26.1O.2022, there is no.representation for the appellant ar-rd therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that that the appellant is not interested to pursue the litigation. Hencc, the Appeal 1S dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/.M.MANJULA DEPUTY REGIS R //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To

1. The I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.

2. One CC to Sri T.V.S.Prabhakara Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to Sri K.Pavan Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies t Kj

I t / ll HIGH COURT DAfED:1511112022 o g STAr€ s I l rl :.'' ,.'/ ,-) 2 B Ju\l ?s8 / T DFl: rN'

JUDGMENT

AS.No.998 of 2003 DISMISSING FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.

e9 {r3