M. Nagesh v. The Govt. Of Telangana State

[ 3255 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA.

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 5121 OF 2017 Between:

M. Nagesh, S/o. Rajender, Aged about 34 years, Working as S.G. Teacher. M.P.P, School, Sitanagaram, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District, Rl/o.Sithampet Village, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District - 506 371. .,.PETITIONER AND

1. The Govt. of Telangana State, rep. by its principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad - 22

2. The District Educational Officer, Warangal District, Warangal. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 226 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the connected records including the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent in C.No.B324lC412015-1 , daled 04-11-2015 wherein placing the applicant under suspension on the ground that he was arrested by the police on 24-06-2015 in the dowry case in FIR No.239/2015, dated '19-06-2015 of Godavari Khani l-Town Police Station, Karimnagar District under section 498-A, 494 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of D.P. Act and set aside the same as illegal, improper, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and further direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant in to service with all consequential benefits Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. B. KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Cou( made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAV.AN KUMAR !^rrur PUrtrtON Lrn) No.s ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded to the same. 2.

Recording the submissions made by learned counsel I appearing on either side, the Wrat Petition (TR) is dismissed as I infructuous.

i.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// ,t SECTION OFFICER To,, Ufr"""

to GP FOR SERVTCES I ,High Court for the State of Tetangana. ? 9n" CC to SRt. B. KRtSHNA, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD copies GJP Es(

HIGH COURT DATED:0710212023 f TE o L4, .s v )t- -.i cl\{ r+ $

ORDER

t..

,1.:

WP(TR).N0.5121 of 2017 \ { DtsMrsstNc THE WRIT PETITION(TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS \er b ^--- -z*\"' gr(