← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaAS/2950/2000dismissed as non prosecution

Rameshchandra Agarwal v. Sri Shanti Prakash Shukla

2023-02-21Abhinand Kumar Shavili3 pages

I 126s7l I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE .

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI APPEAL SUIT NO: 2950 OF 2000 Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and decree dated 14-8-2000 in O.S.No.186/1992 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem Between:

1- Rameshchandra Agarwal, Sio Kannaiahlal, aged 56 years, Occ: Business R/o 1-1-147 , Old Kothagudem, Khammam Dist.

2. AqaN,lal Sevasamithi, regd under the societies regn. Act bearing No. 849/86 re-p. by Secretary Sri Rameshchandra Aganival ...APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 2&4 AND

1. Sri Shanti Prakash Shukla, S/o Amruthalal Shukla' 46 years, Occ: Advocate , Fl/o Sircilla, Karimnagar Dist.

2. Smt. Sarojini Devi, Wo S.P. Shukla, qged 45 years, Household Rl/o Sircilla' rep. by Sri Shanti Prakash Shukla. G.P.A.

...RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS Counsel for the Appellants: SRl. M RAJAMALLA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B ADINARAYANA RAO The Court made the following: JUDGMENT i I I

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI Appeal Suit No.295O of 2OOO JUDGMENT:

None ,rppears lor tlre appellants even though the Appeal 1S listecl to cl ay under the caption 'For Dismissal'. Hence, this Court has no other option except to d ismiss the Appeal for default and also for non-prosecution.

Accorrlingly, this Appeal is dismissed for default as well as for non prosecution. No costs.

3.

As a sequel, miscellaneou-s applications pending if any, shall stand closecl I l SD/-M.MANJULA DEPUW REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// (ltt SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, Khammam District.

2. One CCto SRl. IV RAJATVALLA REDDYAdvocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRl. B ADINARAYANA RAO Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies KKS Pna-

HIGH COURT DATED:21 10212023 I trE S r41{ a J 15 JllL ?ul vz (,) .\ CI * * SD

JUDGMENT

AS.No.2950 of 2000 DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR DEFAULT AS WELL AS NON-PROSECUTION s(q.

q\ s\,-g'

.l