Kalletla Vinayak v. Action Contruction Equipment Ltd And Another

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1821 OF 2018 ORDER:

When the matter called in the fore-noon session, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter is again called in the after-noon session still, there is no representation. Hence, the present CRP is taken up for disposal, for the reason the very relief claimed by the petitioner cannot be maintained under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'Code'). What all the revision petitioner, who is appellant No.2 in A.S. No.40 of 2017 on the file of the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, requests is, to direct the appellate Court to dispose of the said appeal as expeditiously as possible by fixing reasonable time and to pass such other order or orders that may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Thus, when there is no order to revise, invoking the provisions of Section 151 of the Code, does not arise.

Accordingly, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the present revision, stand closed.

___________________________ A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J March 21, 2018.

Mgr