← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP(TR)/4450/2017dismissed as infructuous

D. Prabas Kumar v. The District Educational Officer,

2022-12-14N.V.Shravan Kumar4 pages

[ 32551 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED NO: 4450 OF 2017 Between:

. Marenna, age 47 years, Occ ZPHS:BURGULA, Mandai:

School Assistant Farooq Nagar, D.PRABAS KUMAR, S/O (physical Science), Mahaboobnagar District.

...APPLICANT AND

1. The District Educational Officer, Mahaboobnagar, Mahaboobnagar District 509 001.

2. The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Telangana State at Hyderabad, Hyderabad District a 500004.

3. The Director of School Education, Telangana State at Hyderabad - 500 004

4. The State of Telangana represented by its Principal, Secretary, School Education Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500022.

5. The Head Master, Zilla Parishad High School: Burgula, M.P. Farooq Nagar, Mahaboobnagar District.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to impugned Proceedings Rc.No. 841811507412015 dated 5.7.2015 issued by the D.E.O. Mahabubnagar and quash the same by holding it as illegal, bad, arbitrary and contrary to the Statutory Rules issued in G.O.Ms.No. 12 dated 16.6.2015 and further direct the respondents to continue the applicant at ZPHS, Burgu{a with all consequential benefits.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI J.R.MANOHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR I WRIT PETITION (TR) No.4450 of 2017

ORDER

Today, when the matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned counsel For the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the Writ Petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication.

2.

Recording the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition (TR) IS accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

3.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTA REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC CER To,

1. One CC to SRI J.R.MANOHAR RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CD Copies.

BSK GJPkr

HIGH COURT DATED:1 4112t2022 'f Tc $12 .) ( t ( ?$lt j -)o I 'l\N )

ORDER

g W.P(TR).No.4450 ot 2017 i-a( DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS o --'{ 'zr"\"- grG