Amaragonda Lachamma v. Sri B.Padmaiah,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1 63 0F 2017 Contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Cou(s Act 1971 to punish the Respondent herein for their willful disobedience of the orders dt.2311112016 in WP No.40523 ot 2016.
Between:
Amaragond-a- Lachamma, w/o Komaraiah, aged about 65 years, rio Choppadandi village and Mandal, Karimnagar District_ ...PETITIONER/PETITIONER AND Sri B.Padmaiah,, Tahsildar, Choppadandi Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO. 3 Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl. KALVALA SANJEEV Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO CONTEMFT CASE No.163 of2OL7 ORDER:
The contempt case is filed seeking to punish the respondent under Sections 1O to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, lg7 l, for deliberate and willful disobedience in impiementing the order passed by this Court in W'P'No'40523 of 20 16. dated 23.11.2O16.
2.
No representation on behalf of the petitioner in the morning and alternoon sessions. Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of responclettt.
l 3.
This Court while disposing the writ petltlon on 23.11.2016, directed the 3'd respondent to dispose of the representation dated 01.02.2016 made by the petitioner seeking to enter his name in the revenue records in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.0.31 guntas in Sy'No' 1343/A sit uated at Choppadandi Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District, in accordance with law, at the earliest'
4. Learned Assistant Government pleader basing on the instructions submits that, the respondent complied with the order passed by this Court in W.p.No.40523 of 20 16, dated 23.1t.2016.
In view of the above submissron, no further adjudication is required.
6.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioner is granted riberty to avail the remedies as are available under law, if so advised.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- Ch. Venkateswarlu DEPUWdTEGJSTRAR //TRUE COPY// sEcflMoFFIcER To, 1 . Sri B.Padmaiah, Tahsildar, Choppadandi Mandal, Karimnagar District. ?. gne 9C ro Sri. Katvara Sanjeev, 'eO**t"
IOpUbi'-""'
3. Two CCs to Gp for Revenr.re, Xbn Corrt foriIe -Sia1e ot fehngana. [OUTI
4. Two CD Copies SR $
HIGH COURT JSR, J DATED:29/1212023 ( 1HE S14 14:
o k c'
oo 2 3 rtt'n yn74
ORDER
t ) o6spATCrEo CC.No.163 of 2017 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE @q'3 s, t*'