A.Manoj Singh v. The State Of Telangana,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY Criminal Revision Case No.2922 of 2016 JUDGMENT:

This criminal revision case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., challenging the order dated 05.11.2016 passed in M.C.No.B/ 1539/ 2016 by the Special Executive Magistrate, Hyderabad.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents (TS).

3. On 05.11.2016, the Special Executive Magistrate, Hyderabad District, passed the following order.

" Whereas on 29.08.2016 you become surety by a bond for Sri A. Manoj Singh S/ o late Arjun Singh R/ o 14-08-419/ D, Jummerath Bazar Devi Nagar, Hyderabad, that he would be of good behaviour for a period of three years and bound yourself in default thereof to forfeit the sum of Rs.1,50,000/ - (Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) to the Government and whereas if you have again committed the offence of sale of Ganja is Narcotic in cities and his actives are likely to cause danger to public health and being at large in hazardous to the community you become such respondent, whereby your security bond has become forfeited.

You are therefore hereby required to pay the said penalty of Rs.1,50,000/ - (Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) or to show cause before me within (07) working days as to why the payment of the same should not be enforced against you."

4. A perusal of the record clearly reveals that the learned Executive Magistrate directed the petitioner to pay penalty of Rs.1,50,000/ -. It is settled law that no quasi or judicial order can be passed without affording reasonable opportunity to the affected party. Passing of any order without giving reasonable opportunity to the affected party would amount to violation of principles of natural justice. Admittedly, in the instant case, the order is being passed by the Executive Magistrate, without giving any

opportunity to the petitioner leave apart non-following of the procedure contemplated under the Code of Criminal Procedure. If the order is allowed to stand, it would amount to miscarriage of justice. If there is any illegality or irregularity or impropriety in the orders passed by the lower authority, this court can set aside the same by exercising the revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 Cr.P.C.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order dated 05.11.2016 passed in M.C.No.B/ 1539/ 2016, is set aside and the learned Executive Magistrate is hereby directed to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.

6. The criminal revision case is, accordingly, allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this case, shall stand closed. ____________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J Date: 17.11.2016 BSS

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY Crl.R.C. No.2922 of 2016 Date: 17.11.2016 BSS