← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/16713/2014dismissed as infructuous

Yelisetty Venkata Kameswara Rao, Khammam District v. District Collector, Khammam District And 5 Others

2022-09-14N.V.Shravan Kumar4 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIi/8ER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 16713 OF 2014 Between:

Yelisetty Venkata Kameswara Rao, S/o. Late Nagabhushanam, Aged about 38 years, Hindu, agriculture, Resident of H.No. 1-8-1 5, Tatagudi Center, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District ...PETITIONER AND

1. The District Collector, Khammam, Khammam District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhadrachalam, Khammam Dist.

3. The Tahsildar, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District

4. Puwada Suryanarayana,, S/o. Peda Narasimharao, 71 years, Occ: Doctor, Fi/o. Tatagudi Center, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District'

5. Tavidisetti Rajeswararao,, S/o. Late Lakshmanarao, Occ: Kirana Merchant, Rl/o. Near Girls High School, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District

6. Government of Telangana, rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad.

t ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the HQh Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of rnandamus directing the District Collector, Khammam the 1st respondent herein to dispose of the petitioner application dated 07.06.2014 filed seeking transfer of the appeal ROR No. 1 of 2013 pending on the file of Revenue Divisional Office, Bhadrachalam the 2nd respondent herein filed against grant of patta and title Deed in favour of Puvvada Suryanarayana, the 4th respondent herein.

WPMP. NO: 20767 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Appeal ROR No. 1 of 2013 pending before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhadrachalam the 2nd respondent herein, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitiorrer: SRI R.R.KALYAN Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 & 6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 & 5: -- The Court made the following: ORDER

,l HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 16713OF 2014 ORDER:

& { Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Special Tribunal has already disposed the appeal of the petitioner and orders were passed. He further submits that cause in the writ petition 'does not survive and no further orders are required in .r i i this writ petition.

j ',..1

2. In view of the above submission made by the .learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous as cause in the writ petition does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed.

i 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

t q SD/-P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR '.,/ Lc'

il ,]i //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . One CC to SRI R.R.KALYAN, Advocate IOPUC]

2. Two CCs {o the GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana IOUTI

3. Two C.D. Copies.

4. One Spare CoPY.

\_ MRC \TK l

:

;

HIGH COURT DATED:1410912022 L STAre //-] r 2 3 irr.t t$[ ,:) "t,

ORDER

WP.No. 16713 OF 2014 { DISMISSING Of: THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS