C.Sulochana, v. D.Narsingnath Rao,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAED TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF APRIL ./ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ,- C.R.P. NO:

51 0F 2007 Petition filed under Section 22 of the A.P,Buiildings (Lease,Rent and Eviction) Control Act, aggrieved by the Order da\ed.171112006, passed in R.A.NO.1/2005on the file of the Additional Chuief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, jn R.C.NO.216/2003, dated 22.11.2004, on the file of the Court of the Principal Rent Controller, Hyderabad. Between:

C.Sulochana,, Wo. Hari Kumar, Employee, Ryo. H.No {ownship, Ramachandrapuram, 8271C, Type Quarters, BHEL ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND D.Narsingnath Rao,, S/o. D.Somanarayana, Business, Rl/o. H.No.'1-1-188/6, Known as Super Driving Goods, Chikkadpally,Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT/APPELLANT Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI, VENKAT RAGHU RAMULU : None Appeared Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following : ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE G,ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY C.R.P.No.5951 of 2007

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is arising out of the order dated 17.'l '1 .2006 passed in R.A.No. 1 of 2005, on the file of Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, filed by the appellant against the impugned eviction order dated 2211.2004 passed by the Principal Rent Controller, Hyderabad, in R.C.No.215 of 2003. 2.

Learned counsel for revision petitioner reported that the parties have settled the dispute outside the Court and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in the Civil Revision Petition and this revision petition has become infructuous.

3.

Recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

4.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-G,SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To '1 . The Court of Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court' Hyderabad'

2. The Court of Principal Rent Controller, Hyderabad -

5. On" CC to Sri Venkat Raghu Ramulu, Advocate (OPUC)

4. Two CD CoPies

5. One SPare CoPY Kj.

V

HIGH COURT DATE D : 1 210412022 fr\ ^ j_-q al) 2 B JIJL 2[22 ,) j [\:":

ORDER

CRP.No.5951 of 2007 Dismissing the CRP as infructuous.

a