Dept. Of Employment And Training Tech. Edu. And Another, v. K. Venkata Narasappa And 9 ORS.,

[ 34e01

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 25375 OF 2009 Between:

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Pepartment of Employment and Training' Tech. Education, Secretariai, Hyderabad.

The Director, Employment and Training, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS AND

1. K. VENKATA NARASAPPA S/O. K.U. PATHANAMAPPA, RETIRED PRINCIPAL,

2. BANDI ANNAPPA, S/O. CHINNAPPA, WORKING AS ASSISTANT TRAINING OFFICER,

3. S. SHIVARAMI REDDY, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, WORKING AS ASSISTANT TRAINING OFFICER,

4. M. NAGA RAJA, S/O. M. VENKATA RAMAN, WORKING AS ASSISTANT TRAINING OFFICER,

5. K. RAJENDRA PRASAD, SO. K. NARAYANA, WORK|IIG AS ASSTSTANT TRAINING OFFICER,

6. K. BALAMURALI PRASAD, S/O. K. BALA PRASAD, WORKING AS ASSISTANT TRAINING OFFICER,

7. W. RAJASEKHAR, S/O. KRISHNAMA RAJU, WORKING AS ASSISTANT TRAINING OFFICER,

8. D. CHINA VENKATA REDDY, S/O. VENKATARAMA REDDY, WORKING AS CLERK CUM TYPIST,

9. T. SUDHAKAR, S/O. T. VENKATA RAO, WORKING ASATTENDER, lO.VENKATA RAMANA, S/O. REDAPPA, WORKING AS sWEEPER ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with the order dated 04-03-2009 in O.A. No. 12541200O on the file of the Hon'ble

A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and to quash or set aside the same as erroneous and contrary to law Counsel for the Petitioner: GP FOR SERVICES I NOT PRESENT Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI S. GOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI A. JAGAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 AND 8 to10 :- The Court made the following: ORDER

THEHON'BLESRIJUSTICEABHINANDKUMARSHAVILI AND THEHoN,BLESRIJUSTICEveTTTTRAMAKRISHNAREDDY N ORDER: (Per I-{on ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kutnar Shavili) Despitetistingtlrematterunclerthecaption,fordismissal,, thereisnorepresentationonbehalfofthepetitioners.Therefore, thisCourthasnootheroptiorrexcepttoclismisstheWritPetition for default or non-Prosecution'

2.Accordingly,theWritPetiticlnisdismissedfordefault.There shall be no order as to costs'

Miscellaneous Applications' if arly' pendingr in this Writ I 'R';ti3flNi'A:t'EFRRX / ,'G Petition shatl stand closed'

i SECTION OFFICER ,/TRUE COPY"

I To, he s'1a'le'r re ansana a'[ ; i11if d"{#;:d;["'#;B[, B'M bs

\ I HIGH COUR 8t09t2025 =.t o '., WP.No.25375 of 2009 oR THE s ( ,/q i)o () ( 20liluM '4.

)t ...;/ , DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECCUTION WITHOUT COSTS P \x( l,t