Seva Sudharshan Rao v. Seva Harshasri

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1740 OF 2018 ORDER:

This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging the order dated 12.12.2017 passed in I.A.No.462 of 2014 in O.S.No.116 of 2011 by the Senior Civil Judge at Sathupally, whereby, the petition filed under Order VII Rule 14 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short "C.P.C.") was allowed condoning the delay in filing the documents set out in the list annexed to the petition. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Court below, the present revision is filed mainly on the ground that the documents are not relevant and admissible in evidence and the respondent requested the Court to mark those documents set out in the list subjects to relevancy and admissibility, but the Court allowed the petition without deciding the relevancy and admissibility of the documents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court to pass appropriate order directing the trial Court to consider the relevancy and admissibility of documents set out in the list during trial.

Acceding to the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the order is modified as follows: "Documents set out in the list are received subject to relevancy and admissibility"

MSM,J CRP.No.1740_2018 Further, the trial Court is directed to consider the objection, if any, raised regarding relevancy and admissibility of documents and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. With the above direction, the civil revision petition is disposed of at the admission stage. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand closed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY 16.03.2018 Ksp