T.Harsha S/O T.R.Chowdary v. Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority Rep. By

[ 3302 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAV OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 32244OF 2014 Between:

T.Harsha, S/o T.R.Chowdary, aged about 40 years, resident of House No.3-4-310, Lingampally, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority Rep. by, its Metropolitan C6mmissioner, Tamaka, HYderabad The Gram Panchayat, Peerzadiguda, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Secretariat, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the permission for construction of Retail Shopping centre in Survey No.

61 and 63 of Peerzadiguda Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District in an extent of 6502 square meters to the Petitioner as illegal, null, void and arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to release the permission to the Petitioner.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 201 4(WPMP. NO:40 306 oF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to release the permission for construction of Retail

Shopping Centre in Survey No.61 and 63 of Peerzadiguda Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District in an extent of 6502 square meters to the Petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.1: M/s. D.MADHAVI, SC FOR HMDA Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI P.KISHORE RAO, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATII WRIT PETITION No.32244 of 2Ol4 ORDER:

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the same has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs. I SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGI R //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI K.DURGA PRASAD, Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to M/s. D.MADHAVI, SC FOR HMDA [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRI P.KISHORE RAO, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT [OPUC]

4. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies BSR GJP.-)Y

HIGH COURT l DATED: 08t02t2024 <.

* 2a 21 ttAg nlt * * o6,SPATCH EO

ORDER

WP.No.32244 of 2014 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS g cd(^d YY- -t€Pr