Boyapati Rajeswari And Ano. v. Prl. Secy., Health, Medical And 2 ORS.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO:29611 OF 2011 Between:
1. Boyapati Raleswari, W/o. Sreedhar Naidu, aged about 24 years, Occ: Student, R/o. '1 1-399, Behind Govt. Hospital, Arvind Nagar, Ananthapur.
2. Swetha Pologi, D/o. Brahma Chary, aged aboul 22 years, R/o. Vikarabad, R. R. District, ,,.PETITIONERS AND
1. The Government of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Health, tt4edical & Family Welfare, Secretariat Buildings, Hyd e ra bad.
2. Dr, N.T.R. University of Hea'ith Sciences,(A.P. Vijayawada)rep. by its Registrar,
3. The lndian Nursing Council, Combined Council Building, Kotla Road, Temple Lane, Near lTO, New Delhi, rep. by its Secretary ...RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the rule 4 (iv) of G.O.Ms.No.269, HM & FW (K2) dated 30.11.2009 as illegal, arbitrary and against the provisions of Art. 14, 21 and 254 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same. Further direct the respondents to consider the applications of the petitioners to the course in PB. B.Sc.(N) for the ensuing counseling without referring Rule 4(iv) WPMP.
NO: 36866 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondents 1 and 2 to consider the applications of the petitioners to the course in PB BSc (N) for the academic year 2011-'12 during the course of conselling schedule from 11.11.2011 without reference to clause 4 (iv) of GOIt/s. No. 269 dated 30. 1 1 .09 Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. V. RAVINDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.
GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: SRI D.V. NAGARJUNA BABU SC FOR NTR UNIVERSITY Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'3LE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON'}LE DR JUSTICD CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA TrRIT PETITION No.29611 of 2011 /////'
ORDER:
The learnr d counsel for petitioners submits that pursuant to the interim ordt r of this Court, petitioners have completed their course and the r have been offered employment and therefore, nothing survives in the writ petition for further adjudication. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. As a sequel, mi rcellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand rder as to costs Sd/.I.NA,GA LAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTR R //TRUE COPYi/ SE:CTION ICER To l One CC to Sri V. F :vinder Rao, Advocate IOPUCI Two CCs to GP fo Medical Health and Family Welfare, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hy lerabad. [OUT] One CC to Sri D.V Naoarjuna Babu, SC for NTR University [OPUC] Two CD Copies One Spare Copy 3.
4.
5.
CHR 2!y
HIGH COURT DATED:3011212C21 SIATE 9 1$ ttB Nn /i :)
ORDER
!) W.P.No.29611 ct 2011 fr &8"'4 @ 1t<v ---<---( oslalt:- CLOSING THE UVRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS