Smt. Sabiya Khan v. The State Of Telangana
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION :11917 OF 2020 Between:
9mt. Sabiya Khan, W/o Ghouse Khan, aged 45 years, R/o Bommakal Village, Bommakal [Mandal, Karimnagar District.
AND ...PET|T|ONER
1. The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector (PW), Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.
3. The Gram Panchayat, Bommakal, Village and lVandal, Karimnagar District rep.by its Panchayat Secretary, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one jn the nature of Writ of lVandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Notice No.GP/BlVKl1212020, d1.6.7.2020 issued by the 3rd respondent is illegal and violation of the principles of natural justice and contrary to the permission granted by the Gram Panchayat dt.29.5.2019 and further direct the respondents not to interfere with the construction being made by the petitioner in pursuance to the Permission No,GP/BIVK/2019 dt.29.5.2019.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the petition, the High Court may be pleased do direct the respondents not to interfere with the construction which is being made strictly in accordance with the permission granted by the gram panchayat vide permission No. Permission No.GP/Bl\/tK12019 dt.29.5.2019, pending final disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI G. NARENDER REDDY, S.C. FOR ZPPIGPP/MPP The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to ?
withdraw the writ petition.
2.
Rccoi'ding such permission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous petiUons, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAB p{W* To,'1. One CC to Sri P. Raghavendra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP for PYanchayat Raj anh Rural Development, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
3. One CC to Sri-G. Narend6r Reddy, S.C. For GPPIZPPIyPP IOPUC]
4. Two CD Copies.
IVP AE\\-
HIGH COURT DATED:1 0/08/2020 TA 14:
S e ,J oo t 2 0 AIJCzUI PATC * t
ORDER
WP.No.1 1917 of 2020 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS \q\s,