A. Ravinder v. Dr. M. Manzoor Hussain
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF DECEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1064 OF 2023 contempt case under Section 10 to 12 of conternpt of courts Act to sumrnon the respondents and punish them for willful disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 2047 -2022 in t.A. No. 1 I 2022 in W.p. No. 29865.of 2022. Eletween:
A Ravinder, S/o A.Sathaiah, aged about 52 years, Working as Record Assistaflt, O/o. JNTU College of Engineeiing, Kukatpafy, Hyderabadi ...PETITIONER AND l. Dr. M. Manzoor Hussain, Registrar, JNTU, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.
2. Dr. SmL A..Jalqlakshmi, Principal, JNTU College of Engineering, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District- ... Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 1s1 cpc Rl/w. Rule, 18 of contempt of courts Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High iourt may be pleased to dispense with personal appearance of Petitioner /1st respondent in cc No. 106412023 in the inlerest of justice and pass lA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petitbn under Section 1s1 cPc praying that in ttrc circumstances stated in the affilavit llled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to dispense with personal appearanoe of 2nd respondent in cb No. 1064/2023 in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Rama Krishna for Sri P Raghavendra Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri B. Mayur reddy Sr. Counsel for Sri Abdul euddus Mohd The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HOI{OURABLE SMT. JuSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI CONTEMPT CASE No.1O64 OF 20.23 ORDER:
The Contempt Case is filed seeking punishment to the respondents under Section l0 to 12 of Conternpt of Court Act, for violation and wilful disobedience in implementation of the interim order of this Court dated 2O.O7.2O22 passed, ln I.A.No. I of 2022 in W.P.No.29865 of 2022 and to pass such other order or orders.
2. This Court, vide order dated 20.07.2022 passed ln W.P.No.29865 of 2022, granted interim suspension of the recovery proceedings dated 12.07.2021 and the said order was extended from time to time. As the respondents issued letter dated O3.03.2023 vrolating the order of this Court, the present Contempt Case has been frled.
\ 3.
This Court while admitting the contempt case, issued ,t form-I notice to the respondents on OL.12,2023 and accordingly, the contemnors are present before this Court today.
4. karned counsel appearing for contemnors submitted that the internal letter dated 03.03.2023 was issued by respondent No.l for recovery since he did not have knowledge
about the interim order dated 2O.O7.2O22 granted by this Court in W.P.No.29865 of 2022. It is further submitted that as soon as the respondents came to know about the said order, they kept the letter dated 03.O3.2023 in abeyance and also assured that no recovery would be made till the disposal of the main writ Petition'
S. parned counsel for the petitioner also confirmed that no recovery was made from the petitioner's account till date.
6. In view of the submissions of both the parties, particularly the undertaking given by the contemnors that no recovery would be made till the disposal of the writ petition, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SO/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUW REGISTRAR // \ q/ //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri P Raghavendra Reddy, Advocate {OPUCI
2. One CC to Sri Abdul Quddus Mohd, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies Kul KMS ts
HIGH COURT TMD, J DATED: 2911212023 o,4 i zs rLB zt?-r t'
ORDER
.;9 oEsp t.iC'
GC.No.1064 of 2023 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE d 6c*'
W