Shaik Mahmad John, Ameer Sab v. The State Of Telangana,
[ 3158 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY. THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2765 OF 2019 Between:
Shaik lt/ahmad John@ Ameer Sab, S/o Nabi Saheb Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Telangana,, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Courl of Telangan at Hyderabad RespondenUCom plainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Anticipatory Bail directing the police to release the Petitioner on bail rn the event of his apprehension in connection with Crime No. 37 of 2019 on the file of Chinthalapalem Police Station, Suryapet District in the interests of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI S VIPLAV SIMHA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
ORDER
!
-;:==.EE-,-- -_--
THE IIONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DE\/I CRIMINAL PETITION No.2765 of 2019 ORDER:
The petitioner/sole accused filed the present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking release in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.37 of 2019 of Chinthalapalem Police Station, Suryapet District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 341, 504 and 506 IPC.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. Perused the material on record.
It is submitted by the leamed counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has not committed anv offence. He further submitted that the de facto complainant, being the same community member, developed personal grudge against the petitioner and falsely implicated him in the present case by leveling false and frivolous t t allegations against him. He further submitted that no offence under Sections 341 and 353 IPC is made out against the petitioner. It is further submitted that most part of the investigation in the aforesaid case is completed^ hence, the question of tampering with the witnesses does not arise and the petitioner undertakes to abide any of the conditions imposed by the Court. Thus, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
\ Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on certain terms and conditions.
Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Chinthalapalem Police Station, Suryapet District, within a period of fifteen days from today and on such surrender, the petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the said Station House Officer. Further, the petitioner shall appear before the said Station House Officer on every Wednesday and Sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. for a period of four weeks or till filing of the charge sheet, whichever is earlier.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shail stand closed I \ SD/. P.SATYA ASSISTANT GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// For ASSIST NT REGISTRAR To,
1. The Vlll Additional Sessions Judge at Miryalguda.
2. The Station House Officer, Chinthalapalem police Station, Suryapet District.
3. One CC to SRt. S VtpLAV STMHA REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to PUBLTC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hyderabad. [OUT]
5. One Spare Copy GR .---k*.
HIGH COURT :;| csDJ DATED:04/06/2019
ORDER
CRLP.No.2765 of 2019 OF ,$ z BAIL