← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/3595/2018dismissed as infructuous

Mahamood Mohiuddin, v. The State Of Telangana

2023-03-24Chillakur Sumalatha3 pages

[ 3209 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3595 OF 2018 Between:

1. Mahamood Mohiuddin,, Occ. Business R/o H.No. 6-3-597lN6l1lA Venkataramana Colony Hyderabad,

2. Aziz Mohiuddin @ Hussain,, Occ. Business R/o H.No. 6-3-597lNGl1lA Venkataramana Colony Hyderabad,

3. Arif Mohiuddin @ Sheroz,, Occ. Business Fl/o H.No. 6-3-597lNOl1lA Venkataramana Colony Hyderabad,

4. Hafeez Mohiuddin,, Occ Business, RJo H.No. 13-5-376, Karwan, Hyderabad, ..PETITIONERYACCUSED AND 1 . THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Rep. by tis public prosecutor High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, Hyderabad,

2. Mohd. Jaffer khan,, Occ. Govt. Service (Electric Dept.), Fyo H.No. 13-5-422, MehbubColony,karwanHyderabad ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 588 of 2017 on the file of the Vl Additional Chief metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, and pass l.A. NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, The High Cou( may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the Accused 'l to 8 in C,C No. 588 of 2017 on the file of the Vl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad and pass l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.

C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, The High Court may be pleased to dispense with the certified copy as well as Xerox copy is Filed of C.C No. 588 ot 2017 on the file of the Vl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad in filing of the criminal petition and pass I I This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P VAMSHEEDHAR REDDY ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No1. and of Sri P.Narasimhulu Advocate for the Respondent No.

HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.3595 of 2O18 ORDER:

1.

The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioners in C.C.No.58B of 2Ol7 on the file of the I Court ol VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.

2.

No representation on petitioners' side on call. 3 .

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that the Calendar Case in question was settled before Lok Adalat and thus, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous. 4.

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

5.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/. A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// L-- SECTION OFFICER To, l.TheVlAdditionalchiefMetropolitanMagistrateatNampally,Hyderabad

2. The SHO Tapachabutra' HYderabad S. ln" CC to SRl. P VAMSHEEDHAR REDDY Advocate IoPUC] ; ;.;; ;'"' *Y:']il::#::l:LTJ:

5. Two CCs to SRI' PUBLIC Pt u r*".D&

HIGH COURT DATED:2410312023 =r //., /,. -li | -:

.$ \s n

ORDER

CRLP.No.3595 of 2018 t,,,.

,,'

DISMISSED a- ..,1, \ q.