T. Srinivas, Nizambad v. Northern Power Distribution, Hyd And 2 Others

[ 33041 HIGH COURT FOR TI.IE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESH\1'AR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 20410 OF 2007 Between:

T. Srinivas, S/o. Gangaram, ag ad.

ed about 35 years, Occ: Contract Labour, R/o. 1 2-4-52, Arsapally, Nizamab ...PETITIONER AND Northern Power Distribution Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

Northern Power Distribution Company Limited, Rep by its Chief General Manager (HRD) Warangal.

3. Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, Andhra Pradesh, Northern Power Distribution Company Limited, Nizamabad.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction especially one in the nature of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents rejecting the case of the petitioners in its letter dated '13-7-2005 though he is fully eligible as improper, illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the judgment of this Honble Court in WP No. 5158 of 2003 and batch and WP No. 3053 of 2005 and consequently direct the respondents to consider petitioners case for the appointment of the post LDC or any other equivalent post as per the BPMS No. 36 dated 18-5-1997 by taking cognizance of petitioners service certificates and set aside the Lr.No. CGM(HRD/GM(SyAS-ll/ PO.lv./s10/05 dated 1 3-7-2005. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT A.PANKAJA (Nor PRESENT) Counsel for the Responderrts: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA'ESHWAR RAO w TPE ON o.20410 F2007 ORDER:

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 22.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 29.08.2025 under the caption'for dismissal''

2.

Even on 01.09.2025, though the matter was listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be posted to 08.09'2025 unde;r the same caption' Even today' there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner' It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter' 3.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs' As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending' if any' in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed'

SD/. C.DEEPIKA /.SSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SMT A.PANKAJA, Advocate [OPUCI

2. OneCC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL TOPUCI

3. Two CD CoPies BSR ?i/\(.

TKS

HIGH COURT DATED:0 8/09/2025 {HE S Te

ORDER

0 i JAN ?026 C) WP.No.20410 of 2007 {r ir.... - .

e(', , .'i?f)i !.

.

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS 1:+\'t'd /