Menavallur Gram Panchayath, v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH **** W.ANo.318 OF 2005 Between:

Menavalluru Gram Panchayat, Rep. by its Sarpanch P.Dhasaradhudu, Pentapadu Mandal, West Godavari District .... Appellant A n d The District Collector, West Godavari, Eluru, West Godavari District and others ....Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 06.08.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether their Ladyship/Lordship wish to Yes/No see the fair copy of the Judgment?

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT W.A.No.318 OF 2005 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)

Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

Learned counsel for the appellant does not press the writ appeal and prays for observations that if a prosecution is launched against the appellant in view of the observations made in the impugned order, the Court concerned be directed to decide it on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned order.

Appeal is disposed of as not pressed. It is needless to mention that if criminal offence is registered against the appellant on the basis of observations made in the impugned order, the Court concerned shall deal with the same on merits in accordance with law independently. No costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, also stand disposed of.

_____________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ ___________________ S.V.BHATT, J Date: 06.08.2015 Stp/Lrkm