Mr. Shaik Syed v. The State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO l.A. NO. 4 0F 2020 AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:

96 0F 2020 criminal Revision case under section 397 & 401 of crl P.c against the order dated29.06.2020,returnedtheAnticipatoryBailCRRL.M,P.SRNo.550of2020on the file of the court of the special session Judge for trial of cases under scs and STs(POA)ActCumVllAdditionalDistrictandSessionsJudge'RangaReddy District at L.B.Nagar, Between:

Mr. Shaik Sved, S/o Syed, Aged about 28, years, Occ Priviate employ-e-e ' Rlo S-17.-127 6iojiiii, p",i,rriri'r, 6[]ii"iin"anra iiad6srr state ...PETIIoNER/ Accused AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor' High Court Hyderabad :

2. The Station House officer, Police Station Alwal, Ranga Reddy District .. ResPondents/ ResPondents Saoavathi Kumari, D/o Panthulya aged about 21 years' Occ Private Employee Htl?i!iii'W.;e* uoii"l, Klrat[attv' Hvderabad' State of relangana ...RESPONDENT/ ComPlainant lA NO: 4 oF 2020 PetitionunderSection4S2cPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the, Higft -Court may be pleased to permit ," to *iinJru* the complaint made by me in cr No.24912020 otherwise ,l will be put i"-it*pri"ul" loss whic'h ;;;;"i G compensated in any manner in the interest of justice IA NO:

oF 2020 PetitionunderSection4ol&4S2CPCprayingthatinthecircumstances stateo in ine atridavit filed in .upport ot tt,1e petition, the High court may- be pleased to orant the stav of petition"rA"",lJ"o r"est crime No 249/2020 on the file of P s Alwal Hanga Reddy Dist. CYberabad'

IA NO:2OF 2020 PetitionunderSection4B2cPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinlhe affidavit filed in support ot ir''r" p"t'tion, th6 {igh Court may be pleased to order for substituted service of ruotice-t5-in" Respondint No.3 by publication in any daily newspaper or any other local newspaper'

ANO: 3OF20 0 PetitionunderSection4S2cPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe "tlo.uitliieo ln trpport of the petition, tni: ftigh Court may be pleased to order for .uU.iitut"O service of Notice to the Respondent no 3, by publication in any daily newspaper or any other local Newspaper'

t.A.

o.5of PetitionunderSection25TRlw,4S2cPcprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m-ay-be pleased to il;it ;; to withdraw the comptainant made by me in crime No. 249 I 2020 other wise I will be put to irreparable ioss which cannot be compensated in any manner in the interest of justice.

This case coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandyl .ol plounOs of criminal Revision cise and upon Irearing the argumenls of S-ri^A Ushi ,Reddy, Advocate for the petitioner and ;espondent No. 3 in l.A. No.4 of 2020 and of the prbli" Pro"".rtor on behalf of the Respondent No l and 2 and l A No 4 of 2020 and Sapavathi Kumari appearing in person in lA' No 4 ol 2020 The Court made the following: ORDER ci.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO I.A.No.4 of 2020 AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.396 of 2020 COMMON ORDER:

I.A.No.,1 ol 1020 is tlled b1,the petttionerlde./acto cor.np lain ant/respondent No.3 seel<ing permission of this Court to permit her to rvithdrar'v the complaint made by her in Crime No.249 of 2020 o1'Alr.r,al Police Station.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/respond ent No.3 and after going through the affidavit filed in suppofl of l.A.No.4 o1'2020 and in the light of the report, dated 14.12.2020, submitted by the Registrar (Judicial), I.A.No.4 of 2020 is allowed. Consequently, the criminal revision case is closed, thereby the levision petitioner'/accused is acquitted for the offences punishable undet'Sections 376(2)(n), zllT and 420 IPC and Section 3(2)(va) o1'the Schedulcd Castes ancl Scheduled Tribes (Prevention ol- i\trocities) .,\ct. 1989 in Clinre \o.2-19 ol'2010 o1'Alu al [)olicc Station Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closecl. Sd/. C.V. MALLIKARJUNA VARMA, DEPUTY REGISTRAR v SECTION OFFICER i \ //TRUE COPY// To ilfne Speciat Sessions Judge for trial of cases under SCs & STs ( POA)jt cum Vil Additionat District ""jiliii"* .tudge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar ( (with records if anY)

2. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

3. The station House officer, Alwal Police Station, Ranga Reddy District'

4. One CC to Sri A. Ushi Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)

5. One CC to Ms. Sapavathi Kumari Party'in-person (OPUC)

6. Two C.D.CoPies

if Iil t iI tl rf HIGH COURT PKRJ DATED:2811212020 i :i !.iilI ,,1.:l I rii!i l.

t il TA S e '( oo i02 JAN 2021 J\ * (O DpS!.ir * C\T

ORDER

l.A. No. 4 ot 2020 And CRLRC.No.396 of 2020 ] :

It :t_ 'i I'

I .1t Ctosing the Criminal Revision Case {) <> <)