The Depot Manager, Apsrtc, Hanamkonda Depot,Warangal Dist v. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Warangal And Another

[ 33041 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17483 OF 2007 Between:

The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Hanamkonda Depot, Warangal District ...PETITIONER AND The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, At Warangal QEqfqqf,, . Driver, represented by Depot Secretary, Employees union, APSRTC., Hanamkonda Depot, District Warangal. Dismissed for default as against R2 as per Court Order dt 24.06.2011 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order one particularly in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for all the records relating to Award in lD.No.1 1012004 dated 11 .12.2006 on the file of the Labour court at Warangal which was published in G.O.Rt.No.390 of Labour ,Employment Training and Factories (Lab-l) Department dated 22.2.2007 and set aside the same as arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to law as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP. NO: 22383 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the award in lD.No.11O:2OO4 dated 11.'12.2006 on the file of the Labour court, Warangal which was published in G.O.Rt.No.390 of

Labour, Employment Training and Factories (Lab.l) Depart r :nt dated 22.2.2OO7 pending disposal o'the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R.ANURAG, SC FOR TSRT: Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU NA.IPSXWEN NEO WRIT PETITION No.17483 OF 2OOz ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that respondent No.2 had retired from service in the year 2007 and ail the benehts were paid to respondent No.2. Therefore, the cause in tl.e writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.

2.

In view of the above submission, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in ttris Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

SD/- . SRINIVASA REDDY STANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To, 't. One CC to SRI R.ANURAG, SC FOR TSRTC [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR LABOUR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies BSR LS

HIGH COURT DATED:1 310812025 ( \/,+ C) 1 7 [iT ?t?5 ,./..

i)/ 'a: '

ORDER

WP.No.17483 of 2007 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS / /2.

tl 7/<,-'