Md. Muneeruddin, Kmnr. Dist. v. V.C. And M.D., Apsrtc, Hyd. And Ano.

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD[ 3167 I (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:'1866 OF 2011 Between:

Md. Muneeruddin, S/o. Chand, aged 40 years, Driver E. 319985, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District.

AND ...PET|T|ONER

1. Vice Chairman and Managing Director, APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

2. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Metpally Depot, Metpally, Karimnagar District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more rn the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the office order No.T1102(01y97-DM-MTPL, dated 31.03.1997 passed by 2nd respondent herein in lmposing major punishment of deferment of petitioner annual increment for a period of two (02) years which shall have effect on future increments without conducting departmental enquiry and issuing show cause notice as illegal, arbikary and violation of principles of natural justice and set aside the same and further direct the respondents to modify the punishment as without effect on future increments with the benefit of fixation of pay, but without any arrears or monetary benefits.

l.A. NO: I OF 2Ol11WP[4P, l.loi 2284 OF 20111 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the office order dated 31.03.1997 passed by 2nd respondent. Counsel for th6 Petitioner: SRl. S.V. INDIRA (NOT RPESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI C SUNIL KUMAR REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI ]USTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1866 of 2011 ORDER:

There was no representation for the petitioner or his learned counsel when this matter was taken up for hearing on 25.01.2023. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "For Orders" on 30.01.2023. Accordingly, the matter was listed under the caption "For Orders" on 30.01.2023. However, when the matter was called, there was no representation for the petitioner or his learned counsel. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "For Dismissal" on 31.01.2023.

Today, though the matter appears under the caption 'for Dismissal', there is no representation, yet again, for the petitioner or his learned counsel when it is taken up for hearing. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

"':'

,'

.-i Sd/-MOHD SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// i,J, SECTIOIqOFFICER To,1 One CC to M/S. S.V. INDIRA Advocate [OPUC] i. one ca io Snt. c. suNtl KUMAR REDDY, sc FoR APSRTc IoPUC]

3. Two CD Copies CHR BS rt'-

HIGH COURT DATED:31 10112023 6+).

ORDER

W.P.No.I866 of 2011 <.1 iilJ L El{N i 01 ';

i -1 1{is DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS -4 l,I-- ,,->\ (L!

\:7 6flte= 0Atr r4