Mohd. Abdul Saleem v. Rawoof Sultana , Tasneem Sultana And 3 Others

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.267 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Dr.SA,J) This appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, is filed by the appellant/husband challenging the order and decree dated 21.01.2009 passed in FCOP No.196 of 2007 by the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, whereby the subject FCOP filed by the respondents/wife and children under Section 7 of Family Courts Act for maintenance, was partly allowed. 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record.

3.

No representation for the appellant/husband.

4.

As seen from the material placed on record, there is cogent and convincing evidence that the appellant/husband has capacity to pay the maintenance awarded by the Family Court and whereas the respondents/wife and children have no sufficient means to maintain themselves. The maintenance granted by the Court below is not excessive. There is no infirmity or irregularity in the impugned order, so as to interfere with the same. The appeal is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed.

5.

Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J __________________ JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J Date: 11.04.2022 ssp