M/S Venkat Homes Pvt. Ltd. v. State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.33561 of 2017 O R D E R:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Municipal Corporation.

2.

The complaint of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that the authorities of the respondent Municipal Corporation issued the impugned notice bearing No.682/TPS/C18/GHMC/17, dated 03.10.2017, without indicating any particulars with regard to the alleged irregularities or deviations in the construction of the petitioner herein. 3.

When the mater is taken up, on instructions, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Municipal Corporation that the Municipal Corporation will issue a notice afresh to the petitioner herein indicating the particulars of deviations and thereafter it is open for the petitioner herein to file explanation for the same for consideration by the respondents herein and to proceed further.

4.

Recording the said submission, writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent Corporation to issue notice afresh under Section 461 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 indicating the particulars of the deviations alleged to have been made by the petitioner herein, and if any such notice is issued afresh, petitioner herein shall file an explanation along with the supporting documents within a period of one week from the date of receipt of the said notice and thereafter the respondents shall consider the said explanation and take appropriate further action, in accordance with law. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J Date:06.10.2017 grk

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.33561 of 2017 Dated: 06.10.2017 grk