Kampelly Vijayam v. The State Of Telangana

Date : 6.6.2019 Between:

Kampelly Vijayam S/o Yohan Aged about 68 years R/o H No 19-11-404 Vishwanadh Colony Shambunipet Warangal Petitioner And The State of Telangana Rep by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad & others Respondents The Court made the following:

ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for respondent municipal corporation.

2.

Petitioner claims that Samatha Cooperative society has purchased the subject land and formed lay-out and sold some of the plots and kept remaining plots including plot no. 80 admeasuring 300 sq yards aside. Petitioner alleges that his vendor purchased the said plot No. 80 admeasuring 258.85 sq yards on 26.7.2011. Petitioner now claims that he purchased the said plot on 16.7.2014 and even though relevant documents were not submitted by third respondent, illegally municipal corporation has allotted House number 19-11-295/1 to the third respondent for the same plot purchased by him; that though he made enquiries, no proper information was given as to how house number was allotted to third respondent for the plot purchased by him. In this writ petition, petitioner prays to direct the second respondentmunicipal corporation to cancel the house number allotted to third respondent and to allot the same in his favour. 3.

The documents filed by the petitioner and the averments made in the writ petition itself would show that civil dispute is pending on the same issue. As per the information furnished to the petitioner vide intimation dated 30-4-2019, H No. 19-11-295/1 was assessed in the year 2002 General Survey and no documents are available in the office of municipal corporation. Apparently, petitioner purchased the subject property in the year 2014 and the schedule appended to the registered

documents did not contain house number, though in the boundaries the adjacent house number is mentioned.

4.

Having regard to the facts, on the face of it, it cannot be said that house number was illegally allotted to third party after purchase made by petitioner. Having regard to the same, writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies as available in law. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, are closed.

__________________ P NAVEEN RAO,J DATE: 6-6-2019 TVK

Date : 6.6.2019