← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/22854/2011dismissed as infructuous

Chintareddy Madhusudhan Reddy, v. Government Of A.P.,

2017-10-23S.V.Bhatt1 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT W.P.Nos.5745 & 22854 OF 2011 COMMON ORDER:

Mr.Vadeendra Joshi, holding for Mr.S.Niranjan Reddy, counsel for petitioners, submits that having regard to the subsequent developments, which have taken place during the pendency of the writ petitions, the cause in the writ petitions does not survive. The writ petitions are, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions, stand closed. ____________ S.V.BHATT, J 23rd October, 2017 Lrkm