Survi Sravan Kumar Goud v. K.Chandra Mohan

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1993 OF 2018 ORDER:

Heard the counsel for petitioner and counsel for the respondent.

2.

A perusal of the record no way requires practically any interference against the concurrent findings of the lower court in R.A.No.100 of 2015, on the file of Chief Judge, City Small Causes Courts, Hyderabad, within the scope of Section 22 of the A.P. Buildings Lease, Rent and Eviction Control Act, 1960 and within the scope of law laid down by the Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in Dilbahar Singh Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited1.

3.

Hence, the revision is disposed of, for nothing to admit by granting time till 31.12.2018 to vacate by the petitioner and the party is bound by the concurrent findings of the courts below without any further time for extension and by payment of the amount as was ordered by the court below towards damages for use and occupation in the meantime and the petitioner undertaking by counsel orally before the court of not getting any further extension is recorded and further directed to file the undertaking affidavit of the petitioner before the court below within fifteen days from today. It is made clear that even non filing will not entitle by virtue of this order for any extension from submission 1 (2014) 9 SCC 78

through counsel of not getting any extension and not induct any third parties and pay the amount towards damages for use and occupation as referred supra regularly is binding on the party.

4.

Accordingly and with the above observations, the civil revision petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed in consequence. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________________ DR.B.SIVA SANKARA RAO, J 28.03.2018 SS