← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/9022/2018dismissed

Smt P Kiranmai v. Vijaya Bank

2018-04-18V Ramasubramanian,Gudiseva Shyam Prasad3 pages

* I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN And + W.P.No.9022 of 2018 %Date: 18-04-2018 # Between:

Smt. P. Kiranmai W/o. P. Jagan Mohan Reddy, R/o. H.No.3-4-510, Pent House, Above Apna Bazaar, Barkathpura, Hyderabd, Telangana.

... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Vijaya Bank, rep. by its Branch Manager, West maredpally Branch, D.No.10-2-42/A & C, L.G. Towers, West Maredpally, Secunderabad.

2. The Authorized Officer, the Asset Recovery Management Branch, Vijaya Bank, 103, 104 2nd Floor, Babukhan Estate, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

3. M/s. Hitech Paper Mart, rep. by its Managing Partner, K. Ramanaiah, S/o. K. Subbarayudu, R/o. 204/B, Flat No.302, Sri Venkat Rao Dhamji Residency, Near B.K. Guda park, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad.

... Respondents ! Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. C.B. Ram Mohan Reddy ^ Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr. P.V. Satyanarayana <GIST:

> HEAD NOTE:

? Cases referred

VRS,J & GSP,J W.P.No.9022/2018 HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND W.P.No.9022 of 2018 ORDER: (per VRS,J) It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the e-auction, which was challenged in this writ petition, failed. It appears that the bank has issued a fresh auction notice. Therefore, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the fresh e-auction notice in a manner prescribed by law, this writ petition is dismissed.

6. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN, J.

_____________________ G. SHYAM PRASAD, J.

18th April, 2018 Js.

VRS,J & GSP,J W.P.No.9022/2018 HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND W.P.No.9022 of 2018 (Per VRSJ) 18th April, 2018 Js.