Sri. Nagilla Harikrishna v. Smt. Vemireddy Gayatri Reddy,

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE No: Writ Appeal No.443 of 2026 PROCEEDING SHEET S.

No.

DATE

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 1.

20.04.2026 HCJ (AKrS,J) & GMM, J Note:

Transferred to (i/o) folder before corrections, if any.

I.A.No.1 of 2026 Heard Mr. Subba Rao Vadrevu, learned counsel representing Mr. K.Badri, learned counsel for the appellant; Mr. G.Venkateshwarlu, learned counsel for B/o lur respondent No.1; Mr. G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing for respondents No.2 to 4 (GHMC) and Mr. G.Bhaskar, learned counsel for respondent No.5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 12 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

IA is accordingly allowed.

_____________ HCJ (AKrS,J) _______ GMM,J I.A.No.2 of 2026 Heard Mr. Subba Rao Vadrevu, learned counsel representing Mr. K.Badri, learned counsel for the appellant; Mr. G.Venkateshwarlu, learned counsel for respondent No.1; Mr. G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing for respondents No.2 to 4 (GHMC) and Mr. G.Bhaskar, learned counsel for respondent No.5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the reasons stated in the accompanying

affidavit, the requirement of filing certified copy of the impugned order dated 17.02.2026, passed in W.P.No.4904 of 2026, is dispensed with.

IA is accordingly allowed.

_____________ HCJ (AKrS,J) _________ GMM, J Writ Appeal No.443 of 2026 Writ Appeal is disposed of.

(vide separate judgment) B/o Lur