T.Sudharshan Chary v. M.Bhaskar Reddy And The State Of Telangana, Rep By P.P
:
l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD I FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE . PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8503 OF 2017 Between:
T.SUDHARSHAN CHARY, S/o. S.T.V.R.Chary, aged 58 years, Occ Business, FIat No.403, H.No.9-109iA&8, Raghunatha Estate, P and T Ccilony, Cross Roads, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND METTU BHASKAR REDDY, S/o. M. Chandra Reddy, aged 35 years, Occ Business, Rlio. H.No.9-1-92, Champapet, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
2. The State of Telangana, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the order dated 20-2-2017 made in Crl.MP.No.2342l2O16 in C.C.No.51/2015 on the file of the Hon'ble X Special Magistrate at Erramanzil directing the respondent / complaint to produce all his evidence. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLPMP. NO: 9107 OF 2017) Petition under Section 482 of CI.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Fetition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.S'l of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble X Special Magistrate at Erramanzil pending disposal of the main petitioner.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.KIRAN KUMAR REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri VIZARATH ALl, the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and Sri C.VENKAT REDDY, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 .
The Court made the following: ORDER
I THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL POffITION No.85O3 OF 2Ol7 ORDER:
Mr. B.Sathish, Learned Counsel representing on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the subject matter of the case is compromised between the parties and no further orders are required in the present Criminal Petition. Therefore, seeks to withdraw the Criminal Petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle.
2. Mr. Vizarath Ali, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State takes no objection to the sarne.
3.
Recording the submissions made by both the learned counsel, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- C.PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI N OFFICER To,
1. The X Special Magistrate at Erramanzil, Hyderabad.
2. Two CC's to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad [OUT].
3. One CC to SRl. M.KIRAN KUMAR REDDY, Advocate tOPUCl.
4. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT EW, J DATED: 2910912023 'S-f AT E Op ?
"., ori j.:
ji i;
n ,i +:'
/
ORDER
tq $\\ lsLt rI) * n-1.
CRLP.No.8503 of 2017 CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN