Peddireddy Ram Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.12677 OF 2020 ORDER:

The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to harass the petitioner and not to interfere in the agriculture operations of the petitioner's land to an extent of Ac.2.30 gts in Sy. No.296/AA situated at Nimmani village, Narkatpally Mandal, Nalgonda District.

2.

The present writ petition is taken up for hearing today, i.e. 18.08.2020, through Video Conferencing.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner while reiterating the writ averments, submits that though the interim stay granted by this Court in CRP No.3352 of 2020 had expired long back, even then the respondent police authorities cannot interfere in civil disputes pending between the petitioner and one B. China Pitchi Reddy and another, who obtained ex parte order against the petitioner in O.S. No.478 of 2005.

5.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home has forwarded to this Court by e-mail, written instructions dated 18.08.2020 under the signature of Sub-Inspector of Police, Narketpally police station, Nalgonda District. By the aforesaid written instructions, while denying the writ averments in particular reference to the allegation of respondent Nos.3 and 4 authority interfering with the agriculture operations of the petitioner in

respect of land in Sy. No.296/AA admeasuring Ac.2.30 gts situated at Nimmani village, it is stated that as of now no complaint or case whatsoever was received against the petitioner herein on the file of Narketpally police station over the subject land in question. It is further stated that the respondent police never interfered with the agricultural operations of the petitioner herein and that the respondent police never interfered in the civil disputes much less the dispute of the petitioner herein. It is also stated that the respondent police never visited the subject lands of the petitioner nor demanded him to vacate the land unconditionally. By the aforesaid written instructions, it is stated that the petitioner has approached this Court on mere apprehension without any cause of action and mainly to prevent the police from taking any action in the event of lodging of any complaint in future by the person, who obtained a decree against the petitioner herein by making false allegations against the respondent police.

6.

Having regard to the submissions made as above, since it is specifically denied by the respondent police authorities of their interference with the agricultural operations by visiting to the petitioner's land or asking the petitioner to vacate the land unconditionally, no further orders need be passed in the matter. 7.

Subject to the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs. ___________________________ JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR Date: 18.08.2020 MRKR