R. Venkataiah v. B. Janardhan Naidu(Died) Per Lr Rr-4 -7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE

STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH A.S.M.P.No. 1457 OF 2015 IN/AND A.S.No. 83 OF 2008 Between:

R.Venkataiah @ Venkaiah & another ... Petitioners/Appellants AND B.Janardhana Naidu (Died) & others ... Respondents/Respondents Date of Judgment Pronounced: 27-07-2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? No

2. Whether the copy of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals? No

3. Whether Their Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the judgment? No

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY A.S.M.P.No. 1457 OF 2015 IN/AND A.S.No. 83 OF 2008 COMMON JUDGMENT:

Both the parties are present and they are identified by their respective counsel. The contents of the memorandum of compromise are read over to the parties and they admitted that they voluntarily entered into the compromise.

In view of the compromise arrived between the parties, I find that it is a fit case to record the compromise by exercising power under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the petition is ordered. In view of the orders passed in A.S.M.P.No. 1457 of 2015, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the memorandum of compromise. Pending miscellaneous petitions in this appeal, if any, shall stand closed in consequence. No order as to costs.

Registry is directed to annex a copy of the memorandum of compromise to the decree.

_____________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J.

Date: 27-07-2015.

JSK