← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLRC/603/2024withdrawn

Vinay Awasthi v. Shruti Vora

2024-11-07E.V. Venugopal3 pages

[ 32ss ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL cRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 603 ol 2024 Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the Docket Order dated 06-03-2024 in M.P.No.210 ot 2022 in M.C.No.484 of 2022 on the file of the Court of the Principal Judge, Family Court- Cum Xlll Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

Between:

VinayAwasthi, S/o. MahenderAwasthi, Age: 31 years, Occ:.Pvt Emp]-oy-q.e^,-fl^o 15-Oit-501, OsmanShahi, Ashok Bazar, Hyderabad, TS-500012. ..Petitioner/Respondent AND 'l, Shruti Vora, Wo. Vinay Awasthi, Dio. Laxmikant Vora, Age: 28 years, Occ: Legal Practitioner, R/o. 15-08-308, Feelkhana, Hyderabad. ...RespondenUPetitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad.

...RespondenURespondent lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of lhe Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of further proceedings in Crl.M.P.No.210 ot 2022 kr M.C.No.484 of 2022 dated.O6-03-2024 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court- Cum Xlll Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision.

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Lingam Divakara Rao Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri Harsh Rai Purohit Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri E. Ganesh, Assistant Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E'V' VENUGOPAL VISION o CASE No.6O3 F 2024 CRIMIN AL RE-- ORD ER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are required in this Revision and therefore' seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Revision' t'earned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle'

2.

Permission as sought for is accorded'

3.

Recording the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn' Needless to mention, the petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedies as available under law'

Petitions, pending if any' shall stand closed' Sd/- T. KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR + il //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER Tg, .1 . The Principal Judge, Family Court- Cum Xlll Addl' Metropolitan Sessions Judge, HYderabad.

2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor' High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad. (OUT)

3. One CC to Sri Lingam Divakara Rao' Advocate [OPUC] ; O;" CC to Sri Harsh Raj Purohit' Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD CoPies kam

) HIGH GOURT DATED:0711112024 -== :_. l s 'ia. >

ORDER

.}.f'

co 2 7 il[v 2fl1 I ;) CRLRC.No.603 ot 2024 1\ *''

,"-^''.r.Ht.(1 * THIS CRIMINAL REVISION CASE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN G)q;"

ffi*